Employees are, indeed, incredible assets for any corporate unit. Many companies have distinct proportions of younger and older employees. Both have their own non-negligible place in the growth of the business; however, the perception has split into two different fragments. The first group advocates deploying younger people. The critics of the first notion favor gray hair employees. In my perception, younger blood pitches more in the development of the company's success.
There are umpteen factors that provide a ground for the first argument. The predominant argument is that young blood has i...
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Justin
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- Some people are convinced that mature age employees are beneficial to a company Others think that younger employees contribute more and hence more beneficial to a company Discuss both the views and give your opinion 98
- Because of the busy pace of modern life many children spend most of their time indoors and have little exposure to the natural world Discuss the effects lack of experience with and understanding of nature can have on children as they grow up 88
- International travel is extremely popular these days. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend? Include your opinion and examples from your own experience. 96
- Some people say that all young people should have full time education until they are 18 years old To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 90
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 551, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...usness for the advancement of business. On the other side, old-age personnel are...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1979.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60623229462 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06997730469 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603399433428 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.9515765517 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.95 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.65 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155377719866 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046201726426 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422790669928 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931631195638 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400025597112 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.