Some people argue that companies and private individuals rather than governments should pay to clean up the pollution that they produced To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people argue that companies and private individuals, rather than governments, should pay to clean up the pollution that they produced. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Is is often said that companies and private sectors should be responsible for contamination being discharged into the soil and the atmosphere. Although this phenomenon might be demanding to perform, this is just a beneficial action could be taken as it increase the sense of responsibility to preserve the environment as well as same time and money from my perspective, this view is considerably worthwhile and depicted reasons will be illustrated in this essay.
To begin with, by announcing new rules cleaning up the byproducts and contamination by those factories and organizations which discharge them, the more responsible these authorities will become to consider keeping the environment preserved. To illustrate, despite the dissatisfaction arising on behalf of these companies, after passing some consecutive periods it is witnessed that stronger bonds are established between these places and the natural heritage. The hardship these sections would go through result in reducing contamination discharge as well as declining utilizing chemicals as materials. An example can be food industrial factories which nowadays make up a considerable amount of chemicals as wastes. By adapting the mentioned approach, the worker would point ant how devastating their previous methodology was and after passing a span of two years they come down to empathy and emerging closer bonds between them and surrounded area that this matter is therefore an eye-catching repercussions.

Moreover, within the contemporary era the government allocates a significant budget to overcome contamination issues. If the responsibility of cleaning the environment rests on the organizations and institutions shoulder on the basis of the amount of discharging wastes, the mentioned budget could be invested in some other worthwhile projects that consequently bring better life standards to the citizens of each society for instance, the higher amount of money could be saved, the more schools would be built in poor neighborhoods. So, taking actions in line with saving money will result in leading a happier life for all constituents of the society. Owing to economical saving as a major implication, setting regulations announcing the precise responsibilities of organizations including cleaning their emissions would be reaping the benefits.

All in all, it might be opined that government should enterprise in managing the environment in terms of pollution and contamination. However,
I do believe the stricter organizations are made to clean their emissions up, the greater results are cautch that range from establishing environmentally friendly attitudes as a result of responsibilities and saving money and budget that could be dedicated to eradicate lower life standards. Both repercussions were elaborated on in this essay.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-06-25 Sarina2021 78 view
2022-06-25 Sarina2021 78 view
2022-06-11 HanChann 73 view
Essays by user Sarina2021 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: Is
Is is often said that companies and private s...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put between 'Is' and 'is'.
Suggestion: Is often is
Is is often said that companies and private sectors...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 995, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'repercussion'?
Suggestion: repercussion
...his matter is therefore an eye-catching repercussions. Moreover, within the contemporar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, as a result, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2404.0 1615.20841683 149% => OK
No of words: 423.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68321513002 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36277094127 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560283687943 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 750.6 506.74238477 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.3880281418 49.4020404114 199% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.714285714 106.682146367 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2142857143 20.7667163134 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0833645571043 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0314832325233 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0288878874444 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0534942454052 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183888688178 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.0946893788 156% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.11 50.2224549098 48% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.26 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.78957915832 215% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 10.7795591182 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.