some people argue that regular games have more benefits for young people than modern ones.to what extent do you agree or disagree
advanced technology exaggerated the influence of digital or innovative games among the young generations. It is often argued by some that regular traditional games are more advantageous for people than the newest ones. This essay extremely agrees with the statement because normal games are helpful for physical and mental wellbeing.
Immediate satisfaction and diversion would be achieved through the modern games. In other words, most advanced games are time-consuming and feel relaxed from the surrounding world. For instance, digital games or video games are insisting on the players for a long time without thinking about the outside world. Moreover, such games have intriguing nature and problem-solving to some extent. Such abilities might develop the youngsters to get self-esteem and the ability to face the reality of crisis which help them to act and find an immediate solution.
On the other hand, many regular games have physical attributes and need social surroundings and support. traditional games help the young generations to explore the world through various group games, for instance, sports and athletic games. Furthermore, such games often help people's health status and thereby regulate diseases and fitness. To exemplify, normal games improve the young generation's physical well-being as well as they will get a chance to feel the ground and nature in the long run. In addition, compared to modern games, traditional games have time management, sharing, feeling of satisfaction and most importantly, real and feel-good satisfaction after every games. Whereas, some of the modern games put pressure, and introvert behaviour and feeling of failure and inferiority to some extent.
To sum up, all games have their own priority and quality even though, regular games have more powerful benefits in youngsters life in contrast to modern games.
- the graph below shows the number of houses constructed in particular part of the UK and also shows prediction of 2020 66
- the diagram describe the structure of a home smokery and how it works tp summarise information by selecting key characteristics an compiling a report
- the chart below shows the temperature and rainfall in equatorial and mediteranien climates 67
- Nowadays businesses face problems with new employees who just finished their education and lack some interpersonal skills such as the ability to work in a team What do you think is the main cause of the problem How can it be resolved 81
- successful professional athletes can earn much more than people in other professions such as nurses doctors and teachers some people think it is completely neutral while others think it is unfair do you agree or disgree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Advanced
advanced technology exaggerated the influence of...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Traditional
...d need social surroundings and support. traditional games help the young generations to exp...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 694, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...atisfaction after every games. Whereas, some of the modern games put pressure, and introver...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, for instance, in addition, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52264808362 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79972908054 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564459930314 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3161123277 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8666666667 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320606359284 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110590066603 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876311127558 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211479887818 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620975416442 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.