Some people believe that all the children in school are require to learn at least one foreign language. However, others say that those who are not talented do not have to learn. What is your opinion?
Some schools of thought assert that it is compulsory for children to learn a new language in school while the others believe children without talent should be immuned from that. this is a controversial issue regarding the essential of learning foreign languages, and labelling students in class.
To begin with, weighing role of a new language affects on children is critical. Knowing a new language rather than the mother tounge allows children to communicate with the foreigners. Therefore, young people can socialize, open the networks and make friends with those come from many parts of the world. Furthermore, there are also several opportunities such as studying abroad with a scholarship or working in a foreign country are provided to students with foreign language ability. For instance, many young Vietnamese students who successfully won scholarships from various universities in the U.S, and the ability to use a foreign language is one of the contributing factor to those scholars. Additionally, scientific researches has proved that learning another language enhance the brain performance to certain extent. By virture of that, the children capacity is also improve in a general scale.
Despite such benefits from learning a foreign language, the act of labelling students in the case of young learners who is not success in learning language is unacceptable and irresponsible. The discouragement that those received may be harmful to the overall development of them in the future. Weak students may leave school in early stage of life because of that. Consequently, this must be eliminated at all cost. In turn, it is critical point out to the young generations the necessary of acquiring another language as this may nurture the love of learning languages in each children.
In conclusion, I deem that students should be encourage to learn another language for their own benefits rather than applying enforcement on all or discouragement on less talented learners.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...out talent should be immuned from that. this is a controversial issue regarding the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...hips from various universities in the U.S, and the ability to use a foreign langu...
^
Line 5, column 876, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'improved'.
Suggestion: improved
... of that, the children capacity is also improve in a general scale. Despite such b...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 47, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'encouraged'?
Suggestion: encouraged
...clusion, I deem that students should be encourage to learn another language for their own...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 57, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'learning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: learning
... deem that students should be encourage to learn another language for their own benefits...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37699680511 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03233433115 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552715654952 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7605823474 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.2 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236825723097 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772659850042 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577608616391 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15769357037 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636601787638 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.