Some people believe that all the children in school are require to learn at least one foreign language. However, others say that those who are not talented do not have to learn. What is your opinion?
Some schools of thought assert that it is compulsory for children to learn a new language in school while the others believe children without talent should be immuned from that. this is a controversial issue regarding the essential of learning foreign languages, and labelling students in class.
To begin with, weighing role of a new language affects on children is critical. Knowing a new language rather than the mother tounge allows children to communicate with the foreigners, thus, young people can socialize, open the networks and make friends with those come from many parts of the world. Furthermore, there are also several opportunities such as studying abroad with a scholarship or working in a foreign country are provided to students with foreign language ability. For instance, many young Vietnamese students who successfully won scholarships from various universities in the U.S, and the ability to use a foreign language is one of the contributing factor to those scholars. Additionally, scientific researches has proved that learning another language enhance the brain performance to certain extent, and the capacity of children is also improve in a general scale.
Despite such benefits from learning a foreign language, the act of labelling students in the case of young learners who is not success in learning language is unacceptable and irresponsible. The discouragement that those received may be harmful to the overall development of them in the future. Weak students may leave school in early stage of life because of that, hence, this must be eliminated at all cost. In turn, it is critical point out to the young generations the necessary of acquiring another language as this may nurture the love of learning languages in each children.
In conclusion, I deem that students should be encouraged to learn another language for their own benefits rather than applying enforcement on all or discouragement on less talented learners.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...out talent should be immuned from that. this is a controversial issue regarding the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 596, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...hips from various universities in the U.S, and the ability to use a foreign langu...
^
Line 5, column 858, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'improved'.
Suggestion: improved
...t, and the capacity of children is also improve in a general scale. Despite such b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, regarding, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34083601286 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99898143398 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549839228296 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.1471655061 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.416666667 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9166666667 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238293914351 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900801668571 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587645746693 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157882049345 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635302923134 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.