Some people believe that children should be taught about recycling and avoiding waste at home, while others believe children should learn this at school. Discuss both views and give your own opinion ?
Whether students should learn how to recycle and limit waste at their places of residence or at schools has been a contriversial issue. The merits of both will be elaborated below.
On the one hand, there are two advantages for chidren when they receive education of using watse for othe purposes or limiting amount of trash. First, by observing their parents recycle and reuse their used things, children can copy the patterns of good behaviors from their mom and dad. As children spend the majority of time at home, learning from parental models could be undertaken naturally. In addition to this, normal constraints from supervision of teachers are relieved which also contribute to learning codes of conduct of pupils. Likewise, it is obvious that in educational organisations, young students may not have oppoturnities to take part in practically categorizing garbage or recycling thrown-away objects. By contrast, children can join in the actual activities with their father and mother while they are at their safe heaven. Therefore, it would be comfortable for students that they can learn to protect their living habitat from pollution at their place of living.
On the other hand, children can learn methods to mitigate negative impacts of waste from their teachers and friends. The first benefit when children follow guides of pedagogical expert is that approach to these issue could be easy for them to understand and remember. This is because school teachers are trained to provide knowledge in the most scientifically and effectively way. In this sense, these people are more capable to educate students than students' father and mother. Additionally, given impact of peer pressure, which is the tendency to imitate the behaviors of kids' schoolmates, young students thereby standing a higher chance to establish habit of recycling and restricting waste if their peers are doing the same. Finally, with adequate facilities available at education system, process of learning would become more convenient for students. For instance, by showing images and videos about damage caused by reckless acts of humans upon the evironment, effects from the lessons will be more vivid, therefore make children impressed and remember longer. Thus, children may find it is more thorough and detailed when absorbing knowledge of recycling and dodging waste at schools.
In sum, by watching parents as well as learning from teachers and classmates how to alliviate their affects on the environment, the learning process of children is simplier and less stressed. I believe that the combination of effort from family and school would encourage the rightful views and actions of children towards the nature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-14 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-14 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-01 | Trần Ánh Vy | 56 | view |
- As transport and accommodation problems are increasing in many cities governments are encouraging businesses to move to rural areas Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility 84
- Internet social media have become very popular To what extent do you think this is a good or bad thing Why do you think this is the case 79
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Today news plays an important role in people s lives and news media are more influential than ever before Why is it this case Is it positive or negative 88
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 519, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...which also contribute to learning codes of conduct of pupils. Likewise, it is obvi...
^^
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... On the other hand, children can learn methods to mitigate negative impacts of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, likewise, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2275.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 428.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31542056075 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74122182615 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565420560748 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 692.1 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2593160031 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.736842105 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5263157895 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15789473684 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276454178183 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866368730313 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585840323283 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184033814792 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416138880368 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 519, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...which also contribute to learning codes of conduct of pupils. Likewise, it is obvi...
^^
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... On the other hand, children can learn methods to mitigate negative impacts of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, likewise, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2275.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 428.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31542056075 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74122182615 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565420560748 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 692.1 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2593160031 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.736842105 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5263157895 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15789473684 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276454178183 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866368730313 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585840323283 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184033814792 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416138880368 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.