Apart from intensive study hours, children consider leisure time as a treasure they have possessed. On the one hand, many people argue that children should do organized activities in their free time. However, others feel that they should be given freedom when choosing leisure activities. The merits of both arguments will be analyzed before a conclusion is decided upon.
Firstly, parents who organize activities for children to do in their free time expect that their children would not be exposed to bad things. For example, our parents always have strict rules about what activities we are allowed to do to ensure that we will not be in danger in terms of physical or mental health. They do this in case their children do some stuff like watching violent videos or counter-productive educational products, which could lead to the prospect of committing a crime in the future. Thus, it is clear that organized activities could help parents to put their children in a safe zone.
However, on the other side of this argument, the freedom to do leisure activities would foster children’s creativity to think out of the box. For example, children would feel more excited when they could be able to create new games to play. The pleasurable feeling apparently appeals to them, making them feel that their free time is worth having. Also, children would treasure their time since they at least have freedom apart from hours in the classroom where they must obey the teachers’ rules completely. Thus, this makes it clear why organized activities will not be beneficial for the natural development of children.
In summary, both sides of the argument regarding whether children should obey the organization of parents giving for them in their free time have strong support. However, after analyzing the two camps it is clear that the idea of letting parents manage their children’s leisure activities is not entirely convincing. Thus, it is hoped that children of the future freely choose what activities to do in pastimes.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, firstly, however, regarding, so, thus, apart from, at least, for example, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07185628743 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64633400255 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508982035928 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7043672986 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.875 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437703977294 0.244688304435 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159634828883 0.084324248473 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105895145779 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.311122283226 0.151304729494 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439267776927 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.