The line graph compares the amount of fish and some different kinds of meat have been consumed in a European country from 1979 to 2004.
It is obvious that fish provided the lowest consumption each year. Over the first 10 years, beef is dominated in consumption but chicken provided the highest over the period of 15 years later.
Between 1979 and 2004, chicken consumption went up dramatically from around 140 grams per person per week to 250 grams per person per week. By contrast, lamp eaten declined to approximately 60 grams per person per week. During the same period, the fish consumption had no change over the period shown, but the figure for the beef consumption fluctuated sharply over 25 years.
By 1979, beef is the primary consumable source which provided around 220 grams per person per week. The chicken consumption is lower than the figure for the lamp consumed, but it rapidly overtook the lamp just one year later. The fish was by far the least popular consumption, with figures 60 grams per person per week.
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 84
- Some people say that individuals who make a lot of money are most successful Others think that those who contribute to society like scientists teachers are most successful Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 20
- Different types of robots are being invented which are good friends to humankind and can help them with work and at home Is this a positive or negative development Vietnam 2021 04 24 78
- Task 2 More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes cars and other items What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82485875706 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4486425811 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2309697729 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8888888889 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213900350226 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101991796136 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139512350687 0.0843802449381 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180084313547 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.176405115858 0.0819641961636 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.