There are growing concerns about spending money for education. While some people argue that vocational education should be funded more than higher education, I completely disagree because vocational schools do not give students a bright future compared to universities.
On the one hand, there will be some drawbacks if governments turn their intentions most on skills training. First, a skills trainning course will merely show people how to do a job but it does not include any scientific theory, so learners woudn’t understand fully. Second, if the governments invests more in vocational training than university education, it will create a labor force with only manual skills . Therefore, the prospects that people will move up the career ladder is not realistic.
On the other hand, a university education will give students higher education. After graduating, students can continue their education and apply for a Master or PhD Degree, which provides the basis to be elite scientists. The university environment also facilitates more and more innovations for the future due to remarkable research. Moreover, university students have taught a lot of practical skills about their job in the future as well. For example, a pharmacist leaving unversity will have not only the practical skills but also the capability to study academic research. At universities, students do not study only theory for jobs but they get practice in a variety of soft skills such as leadership and time management that results in landing a high salary job.
In conclusion, although we need blue collar workers such as electricians, auto mechanics and plumbers, we need highly educated, elite scientists more. Therefore, I believe that there must be more investment in universities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32075471698 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94570301479 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607547169811 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3402671797 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.461538462 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321454385435 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110791099228 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460966549597 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184186014933 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432207024443 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.