Some people believe that construction of new public buildings such as museums, town halls and sporting facilities is more important than renovating the existing ones, while others disagree.Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Essay topics:

Some people believe that construction of new public buildings such as museums, town halls and sporting facilities is more important than renovating the existing ones, while others disagree.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Most of the people are agree with this idea that public buildings must be built instead of old refurbishment ones. However, the others have a controversy view with it. From my point of view construct the contemporary sites is crucial that refine previous ones. In the following, both views are debated.
If former buildings were rejuvenate, there would be some advantages. One of the significant pros is that not only the historical side of buildings remain but also a huge budget could be saved. Owing to, by saving; the government could have an investment in the other infrastructures parts as well as improvement. A case in point, by exceed budget; all member of society could be insured and health prices go down. This example clear how other parts of the community could impact with the money obtained from the refinement of old public buildings.
In spite of the old recreational centers must be remained intact for the next generation to remember their histories, by constructing the new one some benefits could be brought up. Firstly, the face of the city is changed when the contemporary architectural buildings are replaced. Besides, the shortage of room and facilities may compensate. Furthermore, apparently, old public buildings are located in the center of cities. Because of this, the distribution of facilities are restricted to this area; all zone of town could have the same accessibility to recreational centers by constructing new public buildings. These points prove that the boon of construction in contrast renovation.
To conclude, this essay discussed why an array of people believe in that new public buildings must be constructed and the others persist in these building should be refined. From my point of opinion, build a new one is outweigh rebuilding.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-05-30 erfan.mohamadi 89 view
2019-05-30 erfan.mohamadi 67 view
Essays by user erfan.mohamadi :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
Most of the people are agree with this idea that public buildings mu...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 26, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'rejuvenated'.
Suggestion: rejuvenated
... are debated. If former buildings were rejuvenate, there would be some advantages. One of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 219, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
...my point of opinion, build a new one is outweigh rebuilding.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, in contrast, as well as, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14432989691 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99370903478 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563573883162 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6547480146 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0588235294 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1176470588 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217613729768 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718936072369 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462510742901 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150318810413 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583963476666 0.056905535591 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.