In recent decades, the appearance of artificial intelligence has so far revolutionized our lives in various aspects. There is a concern that we are not equipped with the skills and experience needed to deal with computers or other technological devices that are becoming smarter than us. While I accept there may be some potential risks associated with machine intelligence, I agree with those who argue that it brings about numerous significant benefits to the foreseeable future of humans.
From an economic and social perspective, a great deal of improvement has come to humans’ lives thanks to the presence of thought-capable artificial beings. One of the noticeable advantages of intelligence machinery is to increase productivity and economic output since machines are tireless and efficient. While employers have to pay for only 8-hour working per labor on a daily basis, Artificial Intelligence can help to ensure 24-hour service availability and will deliver the same performance and consistency throughout the day. Additionally, the life expectancy of humans can be prolonged due to the popularity of intelligence machinery solutions in the healthcare sector these days. Diagnostics may be more appropriate because a wearable artificial machine can monitor users all day. Artificial intelligence can help people extend their knowledge and understanding of medicine. Image-based artificial intelligence diagnoses can help doctors better treat their patients.
On the other side of the spectrum, artificial intelligence can be problematic for several reasons. The first contentious issue plenty of people have with artificial intelligence is how it may affect human employment. With many industries looking to automate certain jobs through the use of intelligent machinery, there is a concern that people would be pushed out of the workforce. However, in most cases, particularly in highly specialized roles, machine intelligence cannot substitute the caliber of human wisdom and what it brings to the table. Another risk is that the dependence of humans on machinery may take a number of personal and social skills of humans away. Human creativity, for example, could be eroded since automatic tools can help to design and create something special; however, they still cannot compete with the human brain. Their creativity is limited to the creative ability of the person who programs and commands them, in other words, artificial intelligence can become skilled but they can never acquire the abilities of their human counterparts.
In conclusion, although the advancement of automatic technology is likely to pose many threats to human beings in some ways, it is evident that artificial intelligence is a positive development since it helps to make major strides in cutting-edge society.
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research business and academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too invaluable to be shared freely Discuss both views and five your 84
- Although abuse of the system are inevitable social welfare payments are essential to protect the rights citizens have to a guaranteed minimum income in a democratic society Discuss You should write at least 250 words You should spend about 40 minutes on 89
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people belive that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situation Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Governments around the world are investing heavily in space exploration Some people say this money should be spent on helping people living in poverty or with significant health problems To what extent do you agree 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, in most cases, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2382.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 428.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56542056075 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14984121732 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56308411215 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 777.6 506.74238477 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9087352534 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.333333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241205488241 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823230721981 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476127293448 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146474900544 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168138709708 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.