Some people believe famous people’s support towards international organizations draws attention to problems. All others think celebrities make the problems less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is argued that the participation of celebrities in charitable activities might lessen their significance, while the opponents oppose that more attention can be drawn to problems being solved by aiding programs once well-known people join the effort. In my opinion, there would be more merits to be praised when stars back up global organizations to deal with prevailing issues.
On the one hand, it is understandable why some individuals do not place their faith in the attendance of famous people in charity campaigns. Firstly, it is because most people might hold that the main purpose of celebrities’ support is to build up their reputation. Joining these charitable jobs may not only help them to appear as a role model for others to admire but also bring lots of monetary advantages to reputed people. Thus, hardly anyone aspiring for fame turns down the opportunity to present in aiding programs, even when they do not thoroughly understand the meaning behind those. Consequently, they are unable to encourage more participants to address the problems. Furthermore, the participation of celebrities may distract the public's attention from the major difficulty, which is supposed to be discussed most.
However, there are still enormous benefits we can reap from notable people engaging in global supporting campaigns. Clearly enough, more attention from the public might be attracted to the problems thanks to the reputation of celebrities. More people, especially adoring fans, would likely make joint efforts to help overcome the obstacle when being inspired by famous stars. Then, the prestigious degrees of the organizations might also be raised as a consequence to be regarded as reliable and trust-worthy. What is more, celebrities are those who often hit the headlines, therefore, information associated with them is ensured to be spreaded out fastly to everyone's notice. Take Thuy Tien for example. By possessing a huge amount of fans, she could easily raise funds to support the homeless in the middle areas of Vietnam.
To recapitulate, regardless of some unwanted drawbacks, the contribution of famous people to the growth of international organizations is undoubtedly beneficial in trying to alleviate prevailing problems.
- Many employers find that their new employees lack sufficient interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team What are the causes Can you suggest some possible solutions 84
- The gap between the rich and the poor is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 89
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- High school students are usually not good at managing money What are the reasons What are the solutions 89
- The consumption of the world s resources is increasing at a dangerous rate What are the causes and solutions 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is argued that the participation of celebrities in...
^^
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'aspires'.
Suggestion: aspires
... to reputed people. Thus, hardly anyone aspiring for fame turns down the opportunity to ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 744, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...ipation of celebrities may distract the publics attention from the major difficulty, wh...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 682, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ded out fastly to everyones notice. Take Thuy Tien for example. By possessing a h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in my opinion, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43874643875 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08943588474 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606837606838 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1141814505 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.3125 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9375 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187394556012 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567004681101 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466409652553 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12151429589 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207906180486 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.