Some people believe that govenrment should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The number of vehicles is more and more increased at an alarming rate that makes citizens have to grabbling with bad traffic such as congestion traffic. Many people support the view that government should invest money in constructing public tranport services, among which subway lines or trains are typical instances while others believe that expanding spaces between two road lanes is the better way. It seems to me that, increasing in size of the highway is not a long-term measure. This essay will discuss both views and explain why I support the former statement.
It is not by chance that using public transport becomes more and more popular in our time. Transport stations have been seen anywhere that helps everybody be likely to take a bus with the low-price easily. More important, public transport users can also save a great deal of money in paying for some fees as petrol or car tax and contribute to alleviate atmospheric pollution.
The are, however, others people believe that extension roads is like a sollution in order to surmount the state of traffic jam. Economically speaking, constructing wider roads with lower-price than developing public transport stations. Driving on the highways will be feeling more comfortable , becoming more convenient and moving faster. Since almost people prefer driving on the widely new streets that makes the number of cars gets larger. In a short time later, city leaderships will be forced face really with the fact that congestion traffic phenomenon returm one more time.
In the final analysis, methods discussed above can helps mitigate heavy traffic. It is time for government to consider carefully these sollutions improving current traffic nowadays. I am inclined to believe that constructing subway lines and trains not only contribute to reduce dramatically overcrowding of traffic but also makes more sense in term of environmental protections.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | happyhappy | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | MOHETH CHOWDARI | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | Lynn2309 | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | ThuBella | 67 | view |
- Although more and more people read the news on the Internet, newspaper will remain the most important source of news for the majority of people. Do you agree or disagree. 61
- Some people believe that govenrment should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinio 89
- Although more and more people read the news on the Internet, newspaper will remain the most important source of news for the majority of people. Do you agree or disagree. 78
- Although more and more people read the news on the Internet, newspaper will remain the most important source of news for the majority of people. Do you agree or disagree ? 67
- When designing a building, the most important factor is intended use of the building rather than its outward appearance. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 424, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: increasing
...is the better way. It seems to me that, increasing in size of the highway is not a long-term measu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ublic transport stations. Driving on the highways will be feeling more comfortabl...
^^
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ighways will be feeling more comfortable , becoming more convenient and moving fas...
^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ming more convenient and moving faster. Since almost people prefer driving on the wid...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, really, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26557377049 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72124714783 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626229508197 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3189905858 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.066666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.06666666667 7.06120827912 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26804785518 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782068107017 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627681067062 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157276430466 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069878725977 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.