There is an increasing number of people concerned about the heavy traffic congestion in many large cities worldwide. It is often argued that government should take responsibility for improving city infrastructure by constructing train and subway lines, whilst others believe that more and wider roads should be built instead. This essay agrees with the former idea and will discuss both points of view.
It is clear that public transport such as trains and subways provide an accessible mean of transport by reducing personal vehicles on roads leading to the traffic congestion reduction. Furthermore, with regards to environmental protection, it helps reduce the pollutant emission from vehicles. It is therefore agreed that the construction of train and subway lines is a better solution to reduce traffic congestion. Japan is a prime example, where witnessed a reduction of 45% of this phenomenon due to the appearance of two subway lines being built in each of the three largest cities namely Tokyo, Kyoto, and Hiroshima in 2014.
However, those opposed to this advocate that the road extension is a much better option to decrease this phenomenon. Road extension, therefore, open larger roads for transport flows to circulate easily, especially in rush hours. However, this option requires a great deal amount of money as well as destroy residential houses. The authorities of Ho Chi Minh city have recently applied this method in district 7 which involving heavy traffic congestion every evening. It was, however, restricted by local people because of losing part of their house areas.
In conclusion, despite being easily constructed, the later option brings many drawbacks to the local citizens, whereas the former one plays a significant role of declining traffic congestion in many ways.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38869257951 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82682420478 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628975265018 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3232787467 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.307692308 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262366643984 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855811278122 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852033774576 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139648368596 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874662532237 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.