Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Certain individuals are of the opinion that the government allocation of financial resources should be distributed to other impoverished countries while others suppose that it is of paramount importance to focus on curbing their domestic issues. From my perspective, I am in consummate agreement with the proposal of determining national priority on internal problems.
On the one hand, it is understandable that cross-border support is a symbol of humanity. Geographically, people are divided into different ethnicities but by nature, humanity is the core connected feature among individuals. Thus, it goes without saying that supporting other countries through the provision of financial or social assistance is a logical and praiseworthy action. Not to mention that helping other nations to deal with financial crises would eliminate the chances of illegal migration which is detrimental to surrounding developed regions.
However, I opine that concentrating on addressing domestic issues such as homelessness or unemployment should be an utmost urgency of any country. To begin with, financial fund from the government is regarded as a crucial means to reserve and maintain welfare schemes as well as social security. The smooth flow of how society works would create a favorable environment for job opportunities which accordingly increases the economic growth rate. Furthermore, employment chances, as a result, generate more personal budgets which people can use to afford decent shelters decreasing the homelessness rate.
In conclusion, although transnational support should be executed as a gesture of humanity, I still believe that any government should put the goal of tackling internal issues in a country to be the top priority.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...fund from the government is regarded as a crucial means to reserve and maintain welfare s...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, furthermore, however, if, so, still, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6641221374 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24582809695 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645038167939 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1968297751 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.909090909 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3636363636 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120930697257 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039047878994 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361437789464 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0715376491241 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292331686856 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.