Some people believe the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent years, the number of people is increasing which causes many difficulties. One of the biggest problems is traffic jam. Some people believe that the solution is for the government to expend money on building rail ways and subway lines to cut down on this trouble. However, another part think that updating road systems is better way to decrease traffic congestion. I completely with the second statement and the essay will discuss in detail.
To begin with, some people think that updating roads is the good solution to reduce traffic problem. It means that private transportation is the main reason why traffic congestion happen. In other words, people prefer using private vehicles to public transports as train, bus and subway so the traffic jam is more and more serious. In short, although trail road and subway lines are developed by the government, this trouble is not solved. This is because of two main reasons. Initially, private transports are very convenient and not too expensive for every class in almost developed countries. By their private vehicle, people could travel wherever and whenever they want. Secondly, many people dislike the noise pollution of both train and metro. For example, as long as people choose subway, they will have to always go on time. Therefore, building more and wider road system is believed to the most effective way to solve this large problem.
On other hand, some people believe that the answer is for the government to spend money building trail ways and subway lines. In short, developing public transports will reduce a figure of people who utilize private vehicles. It is because public transports could pick many people up to places where they want to arrive. In addition, it helps people save a lot of money, natural resources and protect the environment. For example, people will waste 100 dollars per day if they go by car but they will only spend 1 dollar per day provided that they go by train. Therefore, growing public transportation ways is an economical solution to cut down on traffic congestion.
In conclusion, updating public transport ways has many drawbacks. In my opinion, although building more subway lines and rail ways are an economical answer in long period, developing road system is the most effective in reducing the traffic problem
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | happyhappy | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | MOHETH CHOWDARI | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | Lynn2309 | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | ThuBella | 67 | view |
- Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning Why does this happen What are the solutions 81
- Some people think success in the life comes from hard work and determination Others think money and appearance are more important Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are reasons What could be done 63
- Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the government pay some or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages? 73
- Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the government pay some or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 728, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ny people dislike the noise pollution of both train and metro. For example, as lo...
^^
Line 4, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ffective in reducing the traffic problem
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in short, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1938.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.046875 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56058850624 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494791666667 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6398112415 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2608695652 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6956521739 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.34782608696 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391697248213 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106236860382 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928071520811 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260858465989 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371901481723 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.