Some people believe the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
The methods of mitigating traffic jams have been a heated topic of controversy. Some people argue that the construction of larger roads is the answer for the problem. However, I contend that the option to construct railways and subways is a far better measure.
There is a common fallacy that governments could reduce traffic congestion by building and improving more roads. Nevertheless, an increasing in the number of roads means that the citizens are encouraged to purchase more individuals vehicles and as a result, the road could soon be filled with intense traffic again. For instance, traffic jams returned to Shanghai’s main streets not long after they were expanded in 1990s. In brief, if this policy is implemented, traffic congestion would still persist in the long term.
Rail and subway systems, though, could ensure that traffic congestion is properly addressed. Unlike cars or buses, trains are capable of transporting hundreds of people and thus, it could help to reduce traffic flow during rush hours. Moreover, trains are always on time regardless of the level of traffic; Therefore, people choose it as primary method of transport. Consequently, the number of individual vehicles would be decreased accordingly and traffic congestion could be tackled successfully.
In conclusion, building more and larger roads are an unsustainable measure, while train and underground systems be a much more effective solution for the problem of traffic congestion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | happyhappy | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | MOHETH CHOWDARI | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | Lynn2309 | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | ThuBella | 67 | view |
- Some people believe that we cannot learn anything from the past for our life today, while others believe that history is a valuable source of information to understand human's life.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- The table below gives information on UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions oftonnes, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shownbelow. Make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The line chart gives information about the population rate in four different countries from 1970 to 2010 and it is estimated to 2030. 78
- Many people believe that it is important to protect the environment, but they make no effort to protect it themselves.Why do you think it is the case?What actions do you think that individuals can do to protect the environment? 84
- the map below gives information about a school in 2004 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 419, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...reets not long after they were expanded in 1990s. In brief, if this policy is implemente...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in brief, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 230.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4347826087 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95267012542 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613043478261 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0997154826 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.166666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4166666667 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280998254189 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100493284706 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625400481013 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167736996945 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339497993623 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.