Some people believe that individuals cannot improve environment, but only governments and big companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, environmental issues have become a major topic of discussion among people and governments. Many individuals argue that environmental protection can be achieved only by authorities. I disagree with this opinion, as small movements by individuals can have a big impact; any effort for the protection of the environment will be highly appreciated and supported by the public, and this will increase the momentum. My point of view will be further explained below.
Even though many think individual efforts are useless, they have a great impact on a bigger picture. In other words, if everyone thinks that he/she cannot make any difference, there will not be any positive move. For example, in the waste management process segregating the household garbage items will take only a few minutes for the person who is sending the waste materials to the government agencies, but it provides a greater advantage for the government bodies since it is easier for them to process the properly separated waste materials. Therefore, when family members understand the basics of recycling while throwing garbage, they are actually protecting environment.
In addition to this, if media channels and social media highlight the environmental problems in a country, the public will react positively. This means that raising awareness about soil, air or water pollution may draw people’s attention to the seriousness of the issue. In Egypt, for instance, there was a media campaign and the target audience were the farmers who used to wash their animals in the Nile River; according to a statement by the Minister of Environment, many peasants have stopped such a negative habit and have become keen on having a pure drinking water for their cattle and families. This clearly shows that any minor initiatives, especially for the betterment of the environment, will receive a huge support from the public if it is publicized it properly.
Finally, small efforts made by the individuals for the protection of the environment certainly make a difference and encourage others also to contribute. In the light of this, I oppose the given argument which underestimates
individual efforts, and clearly state that individual contribution is as much important as the support provided by government bodies and multinational companies. Awareness will be required to include many citizens.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-07 | islam.elhadidy2018@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the traveling public in the us in 2009 84
- Nowadays many people work part or full time from home Some people say that working from home has many benefits while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion Write at least 250 words 67
- Some people believe that entertainers are paid too much and their impact on the society is negative while others disagree and believe that they deserve the money they make because of their positive effect on others Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Nowadays many people work part or full time from home Some people say that working from home has many benefits while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Some people believe that individuals cannot improve environment but only governments and big companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 551, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'pure drinking water'.
Suggestion: pure drinking water
...ve habit and have become keen on having a pure drinking water for their cattle and families. This cle...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36631016043 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00113531474 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577540106952 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.4625584036 49.4020404114 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.8 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123217333979 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431589659606 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462240853468 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0791738724109 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040811019618 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.