Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

In the day and age, there are a lot of situation which are really unexpected. It is true that numerous people tend to think to accept these situations such as continuing a unhappy job or lacking money. However, taking effort to improving this problems would be better also get some supported. Personally, I believe that society should overcome bad situations.
On the one hand, There are two primary reasons why people unlikely want to change the current life based on their ability and their goals. Firstly, this bad situation can be easily changed by individual or a community, but the government. If we have to live in undeveloped countries in Africa, for example, most part of people have always suffered the lack of food. The authorities should be responsible for these case and take effective methods to improve resident's life. Secondly, It is straightforward that people who do not have ideas to develop their life at the moment. Their objective is just a simple life without thinking and they scare to change which can make completely adverse to stable life.
On the other hand, it seems to me that communities would get better results and challenges for myself if we try taking over bad cases. In the contemporary world, human being must experience some worse emergencies, which can not be predictable an, is an opportunity for us to challenge ourselves. For example, Ho Chi Minh president, is a famous person in Viet Nam, help Vietnamese people learning language during the war and that improve the literature custom in this country. Moreover, People believe that good consequences would come when they put afford enough. Employees could get higher salary when they try selling products which nobody want to do.
In conclusion, I reckon that there will be some problems happening accidently in our life, which are just solved by overcoming by practical way, but not let them there.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun situation seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of situations'.
Suggestion: a lot of situations
In the day and age, there are a lot of situation which are really unexpected. It is true...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ept these situations such as continuing a unhappy job or lacking money. However, ...
^
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ey. However, taking effort to improving this problems would be better also get some ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'an'?
...ergencies, which can not be predictable an, is an opportunity for us to challenge o...
^^^
Line 3, column 643, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'nobody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
... they try selling products which nobody want to do. In conclusion, I reckon that t...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, i reckon, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97791798107 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71603886566 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618296529968 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1800962359 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.625 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1875 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19329664828 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628718753648 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616351819979 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120752074395 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0989552693511 0.056905535591 174% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.