Some people believe that it is better to build new museums and town halls instead of renovating the old ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and relevant examples from your own experience.
Museums are an insight into the rich cultural and traditional or historical heritage that a region or country possesses. presently, some people profess that unlike making investments on renovation of former museums, the establishment of new museums and town halls is a premium development. Here, I have contrasting arguments and therefore would like to discord with the statement of topic.
Commencing with some potential view points, renovation of old museums and town halls is cost effective and eco-friendly as compare to the construction of new buildings. To make it clear, a profuse amount of finance is required if the projects of new museums are undertaken. The more investments in the projects, the more financial burden on a country's budget. Contrary to this, renovating is supposed to be less expensive, which means a healthy proportion of money can be reserved for projects kept on priority lists. What is more, the need for a gigantic land area is apparent for the development of new towns. In response, land clearing by logging of trees is the only option administration is left with. Whereas, amendment of old towns no longer requires deforestation. The benefits of improvements in former properties over new developments are thus very clear.
Throwing lights on some more facts, vintage museums define the cultural heritage and historic background authentically. This is the reason why preservation of such edifices is of utmost importance. Things preserved in the museums of past time, for example, are the epitome of achievements made by kings, former leaders. Old weapons, apparels, paintings, sculptures which are placed in the existing museums showcase affluency of historic background and practiced rituals. On the other hand, new museums may not serve the same purpose as better as old ones. It is, therefore, clear that Overlooking ancient museums may disappear originality or uniqueness of a country's heritage.
To recapitulate, undeniably, new museums and towns have their own fascination and benefits. I, however, still believe that the facts mentioned above are good enough to define why ancient museums should be kept alive by renovation for forthcoming generation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...profuse amount of finance is required if the projects of new museums are undertak...
^^
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hich means a healthy proportion of money can be reserved for projects kept on pr...
^^
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...proportion of money can be reserved for projects kept on priority lists. What is...
^^
Line 3, column 711, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nly option administration is left with. Whereas, amendment of old towns no longer requi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...nce. Things preserved in the museums of past time, for example, are the epitome of achiev...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 544, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ay not serve the same purpose as better as old ones. It is, therefore, clear that...
^^
Line 5, column 574, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as better as old ones. It is, therefore, clear that Overlooking ancient museums m...
^^
Line 8, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e their own fascination and benefits. I, however, still believe that the facts me...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, so, still, then, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46064139942 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18777968624 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594752186589 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1153379895 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.055555556 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0555555556 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199377128514 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583996984109 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534759429313 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123374876078 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0112456629754 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.