Some people say that success is ’10 percent talent and 90 percent hard work’.Is hard work the key to success, or is talent also important?
The ultimate target of every individual is to achieve success. Presently, some people assert that hard work plays a paramount role to achieve success with a massive contribution of ninety percent. Talent is only accounted for ten percent. Here, i would like to cite that the importance of talent is greater than hard work in this competitive world.
There are multifarious points to endorse my view. First and foremost, people who have talent always remain top of the table as compared to those who do hard work. Taking real life example into consideration, Roger Federer, the most talented tennis player, has exceptional inbuilt skills and he remains unbeaten in most of the competition. By contrast, many hard working tennis players try their level best to win the competition but they get failed in front of talented players.
Furthermore, talented professionals have incredible ability to plan, prepare and and do the things better than others. On the contrary, some people have stamina to work longer hours but their ability to think, and organize things is lesser than their rivals. Unlike hard working people, talented people are supposed to be smart, technically skillful and intelligent who have capability to understand and learn in the best manners. Others have conflicting views.
They claim that hard work brings out the maximum internal potential of an individual. To illustrate, hard working people keep doing practice until they do not achieve perfection. Hard work makes them committed for the desired results and finally they succeed on account of their persistent efforts. Whereas, talented people may have less determination and stamina to do practice and it ultimately effects their performance.
To recapitulate, undeniably, hard work is the base of success. However, people with tremendous flair are beyond comparison.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
people who have talent always remain top of the table
people who have talent always remain on the top of tables
Sentence: Furthermore, talented professionals have incredible ability to plan, prepare and and do the things better than others.
Description: The token and is not usually followed by a conjunction, coordinating
Suggestion: Refer to and and and
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 291 350
No. of Characters: 1511 1500
No. of Different Words: 176 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.13 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.192 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.661 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 120 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 86 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 50 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.167 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.833 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.389 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.309 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.558 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.086 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...s only accounted for ten percent. Here, i would like to cite that the importance ...
^
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...ave incredible ability to plan, prepare and and do the things better than others. On th...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...working people keep doing practice until they do not achieve perfection. Hard wor...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37113402062 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78737586711 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604810996564 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.165349123 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8333333333 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1666666667 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38279304407 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120952731772 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830125854827 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226546257515 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871992299848 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.