Some people believe that it is better to live and work in a vertical city with multiple tall buildings, as compared to a horizontal city with fewer tall buildings. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Constructing a building for work or live has been a challenging role for designers. Many people argued that being in vertical city with numerous skyscrapers would make life easy with living space, pollution free and reduce noise level. Whereas, some depicts about the advantage of horizontal place with small buildings such as, easiness of goods and needs, direct contact with earths and sometimes large outer yard. However, in my opinion, horizontal area would be better for living and works because of the nature friendly, and low level of fire and accidents compared to huge building apartments.
Initially, it is often discussed that, tall buildings have many positive side like, large living area with less populated, and comparatively less contamination with road traffic fumes and sand dunes most probably noise pollution. Since, tall buildings usually give an opportunity to accommodate relatively less rooms in each floor than horizontal buildings which may help the inhabitants to have had a plethora of space and privacy for each family or companies. Similarly, vertical buildings has the benefit of less involvement of sand and fumes from the busy outside road and traffic, not to be outdone, distraction of vehicle noise would be less as compared to smaller buildings. For instance, employees from IT company in Mumbai report to the survey that sound restricted tall buildings enhance their performance than in the previous building in wast design construction.
On the other hand, oppose debate that, horizontal buildings are down to earth and people could interact with customers or marketing personal easy than high top buildings with escalator or lift facilities. Not only closeness but also, help them to be in outer back yard, garden and less effect of sunlight exposure. For the small building people explain that less chance of fire accidents and short circuit than tower blocks and easy to escape from endangered area to outside. For example, short circuit fire from long block hospital in India got many burned and death as per the ineffective chance of survive through emergency exit crush.
To sum up, tall buildings are well to stay in comfortably and fewer involvement to outside congested situation and pollution, nevertheless, in my perspective live in horizontal buildings are more safe and security to be with and less chance of escalating global warming issues in some extent and that would be ultimate benefit to be in low florey large area buildings.
- Some people argue that higher taxes should be collected from industries causing higher industrial pollution, whereas others argue that there are better ways to deal with it. Discuss both view and give opinion 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become positive or negative development 84
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 44
- The given pie charts compare the expenses in 7 different categories in 1966 and 1996 by American Citizens Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 74
- The bar charts below describe the weekly hours worked by people in four Scandinavian countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun rooms is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...n opportunity to accommodate relatively less rooms in each floor than horizontal bui...
^^^^
Line 3, column 649, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...traction of vehicle noise would be less as compared to smaller buildings. For inst...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, similarly, so, well, whereas, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 10.4138276553 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2095.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25062656642 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70921174282 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558897243108 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.4060487728 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.153846154 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6923076923 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6923076923 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230724269181 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083841851785 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597211823505 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146062664608 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602932515875 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.