Some people believe that it is better to live and work in vertical cities. Others, however, think that horizontal cities are better for living and working.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Whether residing and working in cities with tall buildings or in cities with one-storey houses covering a wider area of land is better still remains a contentious topic. Both these schools of thought hold valid arguments. From my perspective, being inhabitants in vertical cities would be far more beneficial. This essay will take both sides into consideration and provide the justifications behind my verdict.
On the one hand, I think that residing and pursuing careers in cities with residential areas expanded horizontally would exert overwhelmingly pernicious impacts. One of them is the overuse of land resources. Take cities in the mountainous areas in Northern Vietnam, as an illustration. Here, the natives often devastate reserved forests to erect enormous houses, leading to the lack of land for other indispensable amenities, such as squares and parks. Besides, this type of city construction might take a toll on the environment. As can be witnessed from the previous instance, destroying forests may act as a deterrent to protecting flood-prone areas, thus resulting in adverse effects on people’s lives when confronting natural disasters.
On the other hand, I hold a strong belief that building taller apartments would be far more advantageous. This is derived from the fact that it would make a considerable contribution to their physical health and personal traits as waiting for elevators might accelerate their level of patience, and going on foot might compensate for their strength. Nevertheless, developing living areas vertically might help save land for other essential facilities, such as hospitals and schools and protect the environment. This results from the fact that complex buildings often have modern integrated waste disposal systems; therefore, garbage can be properly treated before being disposed into the environment.
In conclusion, as for the aforementioned reasons, I concur that the construction of vertical cities would be better for accommodation and occupation compared to horizontal ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-20 | lennie.butera | 84 | view |
| 2020-06-23 | Linhthuy0104 | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-23 | Linhthuy0104 | 73 | view |
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more especially when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the 89
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include 67
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The chart below shows changes in exporting goods in a country in 2009 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, as for, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6064516129 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12860655568 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8793115902 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.866666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217774654114 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673193231564 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564501307782 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14497883529 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490224181197 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.