Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Over the past decades, with the development of Internet and information system, information sharing has made great devotion on the progress of our society. As a result, people all over the world are benefited from information sharing. However, wide attention has been paid to whether information should be shard without any limitation. Some convince that as more as possible information is supposed to be shared in scientific research and commercial communities, while some believe that due to the significance and value of information, people should not share it freely.
On one hand, information sharing can facilitate the development of some poor area. People in disadvantaged background can utilize shared information to achieve personal success. Factories in developing countries might be inspired to optimize their production process with the help of shared information. Actually, information sharing can contribute to the reduction of the difference between rich and poor communities and make it possible for everyone to pursue their dreams.
On the other hand, some critical information, such as nuclear weapon and drug production, should be strictly limited. Because some malicious organization can make use of the shared information to hurt and even kill innocent people. Hence, information related to public security should be regulated and well protected.
From my perspective, information sharing in most fields should be encouraged. In fact, enormous websites, like Wikipedia, Google Scholar and etc., play a vital role in information sharing. Meanwhile, information concerning public security and personal privacy should not spread freely and a number of laws are proposed to limit these behaviours.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | benj212 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Mouaz1994 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | mirolinquency | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | wondertran | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Asma Shahin | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 364, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... limitation. Some convince that as more as possible information is supposed to be ...
^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ebsites, like Wikipedia, Google Scholar and etc., play a vital role in information shari...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, however, if, so, well, while, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 8.3376753507 324% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70817120623 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06705135911 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5953307393 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9824359002 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.785714286 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370130258219 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131323596751 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838551227828 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224387980691 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827627120561 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.