Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give yo

Essay topics:

Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

although, some people contend it is moral to contribute the data in different fields like scientific research, business and the academic world, other believe some information contains valuable data and are important so they should not be shared freely. I agree with the second view because it benefits both science and scholars.

On the one hand, a good reason that some people prefer to access many scientific information and other business or academic data freely is that as these kind of data are available in libraries and some websites, all of them need memberships so many scientists, students and researchers wouldn’t afford the high price of these places membership. although, they have a strong potential to innovate something in their fields, their resources may be limited. therefore, they may not fulfill their aims in comparison with a person who could afford the membership costs.

On the other hand, there are some argument that sharing some information like scientific research and academic world without any payment is not right because some of these resources contain valuable data and I agree. In terms of scientific, economic or academic scholars, A researcher works hard to infer a conjecture in these fields. it may takes some decades that a valuable data could be extracted from him or her findings. A scholar sacrifices his or her life to give world a new idea or truth. In the other words, the price for a researcher’s researches is next to the value of her or his life which is spent in science. From the perspective of research itself, there are various people who work as background to have a correct and eminent article. For example, a typist, a corrector, or a printer company. Obviously, a scholar must pay them with him or her own budget. therefore, the money that is earned from sharing a researcher’s article costly, it may be a compensation to all the budget he spent.

In conclusion, though, there are some argument that scientific, business and academic fields articles should be free for all the people, I agree with the view that there should be a payment for resources as they contain important information.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-24 benj212 61 view
2020-01-13 Mouaz1994 78 view
2020-01-09 mirolinquency 73 view
2020-01-08 wondertran 89 view
2019-12-28 Asma Shahin 84 view
Essays by user olParya :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
although, some people contend it is moral to con...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[4]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much scientific information', 'a good deal of scientific information'.
Suggestion: much scientific information; a good deal of scientific information
...eason that some people prefer to access many scientific information and other business or academic data fr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...formation and other business or academic data freely is that as these kind of dat...
^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ess or academic data freely is that as these kind of data are available in libraries and ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'places'' or 'place's'?
Suggestion: places'; place's
...n't afford the high price of these places membership. although, they have a stron...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
... high price of these places membership. although, they have a strong potential to innova...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 462, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...fields, their resources may be limited. therefore, they may not fulfill their aims in com...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 336, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... to infer a conjecture in these fields. it may takes some decades that a valuable ...
^^
Line 9, column 883, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...st pay them with him or her own budget. therefore, the money that is earned from sharing ...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, second, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1818.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89059778516 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480555555556 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.5487311707 49.4020404114 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.2 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346897300335 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102200489479 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117720351487 0.0667982634062 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228477882017 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114878328562 0.056905535591 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.