The modernity of the 2000's dove into the world of consumption with an extreme increase in the production of different kinds of possessions to offer to humankind due to technology growth. It produced a high level of competition between manufacturers and small businesses, followingly led to the situation where a person suffers from a wide range of options to choose from. I personally mostly agree with the previous fact, except for a few opposite points, which the next paragraphs will explain.
It is one hundred percent true that commodities that are easy to produce or have high demand overwhelmed the market with a variety of brands, e.g. food, drinks, clothes, care products, cosmetics, gadgets such as mobile phones or tablets, journals, and books, etc. For example, in the grocery store, a person can see about 20 different brands of milk, which are almost the same product. Similar logic can be applied to the entertainment sector, where the people in the big cities have hundreds of activities to spend their leisure time, but the inability to choose often ends up staying at home.
On the other hand, there are still various things that have few or no alternatives at all, due to insufficiently developed technologies. For instance, medicine still has only one option to cure cancer, therefore humankind does not have a choice how to treat themselves. Decades ago no treatments were known at all, thus it is still a progress and maybe sometime in the future, the number of medications for cancer treatment will be as high as for the common cold.
Everything considered, I believe that generally people have indeed a plethora of options. Namely, what to wear, what to eat, or where to go. However, science and technology have a big room for development, which will someday cover every sector of our lives with a bunch of choices of how to recover, how to fly into space, and how to live forever.
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in differnt countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisos where relevant 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 61
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, e.g., however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, as for, except for, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89197530864 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76653933687 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623456790123 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.7824185427 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.083333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124151569621 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476027512074 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386191104998 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073792794318 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430014013971 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.