Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

Essay topics:

Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Individuals who live in today's world are undeniably fortunate with technology and a vast array of consumable products that they utilize on a daily basis. From this vantage point, it appears that people have too many options in their lives, but the truth is quite the contrary. I suppose that when they are constrained in choosing critical life choices, they can become overwhelmed with inconsequential pickings.

To begin with, people can use the Internet to discover information and find answers to their issues. Earlier, they were more likely to go to the library or speak with their teacher to receive answers. From an informal sources' view point, it appears very evident that individuals now have more freedom to obtain information from the internet, and it is not an overstatement to say that people's options are much broader now than they were previously. However, the majority of the world's population continues to lack Internet access, and not all publicly available online material is authentic and reliable. Fake news and information they see or read online will generate societal instability and remind individuals that information can sometimes be more misleading than helpful.

There is no doubt that the world now has many satellite channels to enjoy; different brands to shop for and fashion products that drive people to make choices; different dishes in restaurants; and many alternatives at work, but choices are typically confined to minor difficulties. For example, someone may order a variety of items for supper at a restaurant, but when it comes to eating organic and farm-fresh fruits and vegetables, the selections are naturally limited. Similarly, everyone has a variety of career alternatives to pick from, but when it comes to finding work or starting a business in their own nation, the options are necessarily limited.

In conclusion, the freedom to choose crucial aspects like work, healthy food, area of residence, and access to authentic information is considerably more significant than the freedom to choose many commercial products. Presently, we have numerous choices among such petty choices but not so many choices when it comes to making crucial decisions.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-02 celine ayoub 67 view
2024-05-07 123456abcxyz 78 view
2024-04-02 zanzendegi 73 view
2024-04-02 zanzendegi 61 view
2024-04-02 zanzendegi 61 view
Essays by user cleee :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'source'?
Suggestion: source
...er to receive answers. From an informal sources view point, it appears very evident tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...reviously. However, the majority of the worlds population continues to lack Internet a...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, similarly, so, then, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, no doubt, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1858.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30857142857 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87091537703 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568571428571 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 0.809619238477 988% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.3351577597 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.923076923 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9230769231 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141047584132 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527763470664 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061408681828 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903972026714 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387106500171 0.056905535591 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'source'?
Suggestion: source
...er to receive answers. From an informal sources view point, it appears very evident tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...reviously. However, the majority of the worlds population continues to lack Internet a...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, similarly, so, then, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, no doubt, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1858.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30857142857 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87091537703 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568571428571 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 0.809619238477 988% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.3351577597 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.923076923 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9230769231 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.15384615385 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141047584132 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527763470664 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061408681828 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903972026714 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387106500171 0.056905535591 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.