Some people believe that nowadays we have too many . To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Having different choices when people decide to do something has brought significant changes to our lives in recent years. Yet, there remains some disagreement as to whether these choices have either negative or positive impacts on our lives. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, I personally believe that benefits of various options far outweigh its drawbacks. These benefits are twofold.
First of all, it is an indisputable fact that diverse choices would bring different solutions when encountering any problems or issues. We are not put under compulsion of circumstances and can find another way to get through it. Moreover, in the past, when the technology was not developed, people had to use rudimentary methods to do things like cooking or harvesting. Thanks to our modern technology, nowadays everything has become much simpler and faster, people always have different choices from choosing a shirt to cooking dishes.
Equally important, though having various options to choose, people would have chances to experience and finally decide what suits them the most. Small quantities of choices only give basic insight into their abilities. Whereas, plenty of opportunities bring experiences and things that people need to know what is good and bad to themselves. For instance, nowadays, after finishing highschool, people have two options, either going to university or taking a gap year. Unlike in the past, students had to go to university immediately. Therefore, they could not know what subject most fit them.
Admittedly, in some cases, too many choices may lead to confusion, people may have a hard time to decide. Nonetheless, I would contend that the confusion is essential when you want to make the best decision.
By way of conclusion, I once reaffirm my position that diverse choices have a great impact on our life to meet the demand for everyone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...s. Yet, there remains some disagreement as to whether these choices have either negative or p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wbacks. These benefits are twofold. First of all, it is an indisputable fact...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... choosing a shirt to cooking dishes. Equally important, though having various...
^^^
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...oosing a shirt to cooking dishes. Equally important, though having various option...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot know what subject most fit them. Admittedly, in some cases, too many choi...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...you want to make the best decision. By way of conclusion, I once reaffirm my...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, whereas, while, as to, for instance, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28052805281 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79685397191 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643564356436 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4216323949 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1176470588 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210263067593 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558467769389 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468868634103 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104096015749 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428757564785 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.