Some people believe online reading materials should only be used for a child to learn to read whereas others believe only printed material should be used Discuss both views and give your opinion

Some people argue that only electronic reading material should be used for children to read, while others contend that only printed material is appropriate. This essay will discuss both sides of the view and then I will give my opinion.

Usage of online content for children to learn to read has benefits. Electronic media is higly accessible with low cost to its production. This makes it easy to use for exposing a child to wide variety of subject. For example there are a lot of free story books available on Internet which can be used by kids. Additionally, using electronic media for learning to read will assist in familiarizing childeren to tecnology. Nowadays tecnoloagy is huge part of everyday life. Early exposure will ease the childern into acquainting themselves with how to efficiently use it.

Printed material also has some advantage for children. Using printed content as reading material has been proven by studies to be best for comprehending a subject. It is slower to read and children will take time to understand the matter. It is also appropriate for note taking, highlighting and memorisation. In addition to that physical reading material will cause some emotional attachment for kids. This will prompt them to take better care of their things and teach them responsibility.

In conclusion, printed material does have its benefits. However, I am inclined to believe that electonic media serves better as the medium for learning. The easy accessibility of knowledge provides new outlook to learning. Also techonogy has become central to life and children should be allowed to immerse in its wonders.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ledge provides new outlook to learning. Also techonogy has become central to life an...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, then, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16603773585 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85110759614 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581132075472 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.3358313394 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.0526315789 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9473684211 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26315789474 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44145025713 0.244688304435 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117260929676 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123119759736 0.0667982634062 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276128226519 0.151304729494 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148569417776 0.056905535591 261% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.11 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.