People who adopt imaginative view when they are reading books or watching television, it is undoubtedly true that they are swimming on the vast ocan of knowledge and creativity. I completely agree and advocating the readers rather than media through out the essay.
First of all, Books specializes only on knowledge and imagination, when the media channels try to draw the maximum viewers for there programmes. Therefore its is unfamiliar that the television provide the shows those are educative or immaginative. Though in certain extent television may provide the visualization of the story but its rare as viewers hardly pay as much attention as the reders do.
On the other hand, most Telivision programs the means of entertainment. A slow coach person may pass their laisure lime by watching tv for entertainment. Whereas, people who prefer books, magazines for pleasure, surely they are cultivating their imagintive thinking as well as language skills
To conclude, people who prefer the ideas,imagination overall the theme of the book, later on it is quite common that they will read those books again and again.
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 89
- Some people think that the government wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view? 69
- Some people believe that people who read books can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV. Discuss both views and give your own opinions. 56
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- TOPIC 2: Some people think that the government is wasting money on arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.To what extent do you agree with this view? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
People who adopt imaginative view when they are reading books or wat...
^^
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... imaginative view when they are reading books or watching television, it is und...
^^
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...when they are reading books or watching television, it is undoubtedly true that ...
^^
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on, it is undoubtedly true that they are swimming on the vast ocan of knowledge a...
^^
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...dvocating the readers rather than media through out the essay. First of all, Books special...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e maximum viewers for there programmes. Therefore its is unfamiliar that the television p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 41, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , imagination
...To conclude, people who prefer the ideas,imagination overall the theme of the book, later o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 65, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...prefer the ideas,imagination overall the theme of the book, later on it is quite ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, so, therefore, well, whereas, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 41.998997996 36% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 1615.20841683 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 180.0 315.596192385 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23888888889 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98830539534 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 176.041082164 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.655555555556 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 506.74238477 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.9734765599 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.875 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264399560103 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082706047585 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10504336162 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156462222757 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819231437738 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.