Some people believe that pop stars deserve to earn more money than classical music performers. Some disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is a heated debate about whether the high pay for trending music stars is worth their abilities or it is classical musician who deserves a better earning. From my personal standpoint, notwithstanding that both viewpoints bear their own merits, I would content with the former.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that there are plenty of reasons backed up for pop stars’ high income. First and foremost, it can be attributed to their cramped schedule with regular recording time and countless performance tour. Not only top-tier singers have to endure heavier workload and longer working hours but they also have the responsibility to satisfy the audience’s demands. Hence, the more their salary, the more their contribution to the entertainment industry. Secondly, we are all acknowledge that trending singer normally have a short-lived career, which means that they only earn the most during their golden time. That is the explanation for why most of them would do their best in these prosperous years so as to make ends meet for the rest of their life. In the case of a famous Korean boy group - HOT, the press are now considered their style and music as out-dated and are no longer in the mass public’s preference, and it is cleared that their income is a lot lower than that in their golden period.
On the second hand, we can not take the talents of classical musician for granted. All classical performers have to go under persistent training with endless practicing hours and strict requirements with the aim to meet the highly demand of the classical field. Moreover, it has been widely considered for centuries that classical music is the wealth’s priority. Since this genre mostly serve for those from the upper class, classical singers’ income go in accordance with their audiences’ budget.
In the nutshell, despite the fact that both careers have their own difficulties, I still advocate that pop stars are more worthy of a higher income because of their burdensome duty.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-01 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the disadvantages outweigh the advantages 89
- Some people think that childcare centers provide the best services for children of pre school age Other working parents think that family members such as grandparents will be better carers for their kids Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Films were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative 89
- Some people think children have the freedom to make mistakes while other people believe that adults should prevent children from making mistakes Discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 726, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...do their best in these prosperous years so as to make ends meet for the rest of their li...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03903903904 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73037477183 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582582582583 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3722569999 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.857142857 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7857142857 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126885335876 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492991687137 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341668265318 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948146153848 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244096913747 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.