Some people believe that to prevent illness and disease, governments should focus more on environmental pollution and housing problems. To some extent do you agree or disagree?
The health of the general population is of great concern to many people. Some suggest that political leaders can safeguard their citizens by investing in resolving environmental and housing issues. In my opinion, this viewpoint is partly right because prevention of sicknesses should be initially come from the improvement in the medical industry.
It is understandably why some persons motivate the interference of governments in preservation of environment and control over the housing market. The former approach eliminates the impact of environmental factors on the public health. Policies in order to reducing of emission from vehicles and plants, decreasing carbon footprint, deploying eco-friendly energy sources and so forth, help alliviate impacts of pollution upon human’s general health. For instance, utilization of electric vehicles would cut use of fossil fuel, thereby lowering the amount of gas emission in the air which people may inhale. This in turn ameliorates risk of contracting illnesses related to people's respiratory system. Secondly, lack of accommodation is another culprit of many health problems among persons. If people are not able to afford living in houses, they would be prone to the weather changes such as rain, snow, heat. It is dangerous for the homeless as excessive exposure to these elements would gradually deteriorates the well-being and make their sicknesses become uncurable.
While the need to solve environmental negative effects and shortage of houses is underscored, degradation of the public health should receive immediate attention from the authorities. Even though government’s intervention in protecting the environment and housing market could curb the long-term impact of these problems on citizens, the need to improve public health seems more urgent. Given the advent of new medicines and treatments, millions of people are able to endure less pain and avoid deathly diseases such as HIV or cancers. Likewise, Government’s funding in medical sector could be harnessed to equip state-of-the-art machines, construct new hospitals and raise living standard of medical workers. Combination of the methods could resolve more pressing problem upon the health of many patients.
In sum, governments should combine their solutions to alliviate the drawbacks of healh issues on their inhabitants instead of intervening in pollution of the natural world and housing market.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-14 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-09 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- Some people think that staying in hotels is not a good option to know about a country or its people To what extent do you agree or disagree with this argument 89
- Some people say that the main aim of advertising is to improve the sales of products that people do not really need To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Giving detailed descriptions of crimes in newspapers and on TV can have negative consequences so this kind of information should be restricted in the media To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- If a product is good or it meets people s needs people will buy it So advertising is unnecessary and no more than entertainment Agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 824, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to live'.
Suggestion: to live
...rsons. If people are not able to afford living in houses, they would be prone to the w...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1000, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'deteriorate'
Suggestion: deteriorate
...osure to these elements would gradually deteriorates the well-being and make their sicknesse...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2067.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67857142857 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05329798868 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604395604396 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6737847292 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.588235294 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4117647059 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210373214171 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580242397504 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414189077122 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119994882934 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0123421317777 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.