Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Today, many people think that experts such as doctors and engineers should work in the country where they were trained. Although there are good arguments in favour of this viewpoint, I personally believe that they are free to choose the nation where they want to work.
On the one hand, people can work more effectively with the way they learn in this country. They do not have to waste time getting familiar with other methods in foreign. Moreover, if they work in the country where they studied, they will be respected by people in this country because residents all know about the talent of professionals.
On the other hand, I believe that it is more beneficial for experts to work in another country that they wish. Firstly, they will have more opportunities to develop. In many countries, it is easy to find a job with a high salary and there are many chances for advancement. Secondly, professionals may improve quality of life and experience new cultures. For example, in foreign countries, there are better facilities such as public transportation, education system and medical system, so they can work with comfortable and convenient conditions. In addition, professionals can expand their knowledge. For instance, they may acquire new knowledge in another country where they have not yet learned.
In conclusion, many people argue that doctors and engineers should work in the country where they studied in order to work more effectively and be respected by residents in this country. However, I strongly believe that they should work in their dream country because they will get many opportunities to promote, improve their life, explore new cultures and get more knowledge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-03 | awu212 | 89 | view |
| 2024-05-28 | AnnaAlysia | 73 | view |
| 2024-04-26 | 123456abcxyz | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-14 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-14 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1083032491 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75225716857 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483754512635 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2280615304 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.071428571 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.493383475148 0.244688304435 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187958361059 0.084324248473 223% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124688648071 0.0667982634062 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.351074757459 0.151304729494 232% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615167440932 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.