The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement

Essay topics:

The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead.

To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Nowadays, people always arguing that the administration shouldn't use their funds on things such as arts, music and theatre, instead, they should use their funds on public facilities. While it is sure that amenities are important, government investment in arts, music, and these can have significant benefits for individuals and society as a whole. Therefore, I disagree that such investments are a waste of money.

First of all, investment in these cultural industries has significant social and economic benefits.Through this kind of input, it can own some positive effects on individuals and communities. For instance, the arts can foster creativity and innovation, creating a perfect cultural environment which suits for nourishing the residents' mental health. Moreover, it will gain the residents a sense of belonging which also promotes social cohesion. Last but not least, with these kind of mental therapy, it can not only promote individuals' mental health, but will also reduce healthcare costs and lead to greater productivity and overall well-being.

However, public services are important, government investment in the arts, music should not be overlooked. Public services such as housing, transportation and all of these facilities are things which meet the locals basic need, so it is important for governments to balance investments in both public services and art products. For example, governments can partner with private oranizations and allocate funds specifically for arts, music and theatre without neglecting public services. In some European countries, there has lots of examples which include governments introduce private companies to help to set up the cities' cultural industry.

To sum up, there is no doubt that public services are significantly important in city's construction, but also, we should valued the essentiality of government investment in the arts, music and theatre for the well-being of individuals and society.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-11 SUSANNA PETROSYAN 78 view
2023-05-08 SUSANNA PETROSYAN 84 view
2023-03-28 butterflyluo 61 view
2023-03-28 butterflyluo 61 view
2023-03-28 butterflyluo 56 view
Essays by user butterflyluo :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... always arguing that the administration shouldnt use their funds on things such as arts,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Through
...ignificant social and economic benefits.Through this kind of input, it can own some pos...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...cial cohesion. Last but not least, with these kind of mental therapy, it can not only prom...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, kind of, no doubt, such as, first of all, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63175675676 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09180322295 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550675675676 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4421423239 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.916666667 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.75 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348470858589 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135353874966 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921422215578 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220907454419 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955480352432 0.056905535591 168% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... always arguing that the administration shouldnt use their funds on things such as arts,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Through
...ignificant social and economic benefits.Through this kind of input, it can own some pos...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...cial cohesion. Last but not least, with these kind of mental therapy, it can not only prom...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, kind of, no doubt, such as, first of all, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63175675676 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09180322295 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550675675676 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4421423239 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.916666667 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.75 7.06120827912 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348470858589 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135353874966 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921422215578 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220907454419 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955480352432 0.056905535591 168% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.