The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003.
According to the chart that, it is clear from that oil was the only energy leading in both years. Oil was consumed just over a half (52%) in 1985 but in 2003 it fell slightly to 39%. Hydrogen was remained stable in 1985 and 2003 at 4%. The least energy was used by other renewable sources. In 1985, they only used 1% where it jumped up minimally in 2003 to 4%.
The use of natural gas and coal showed an increase from 13% and 8% in 1985 to 23% and 13% in 2003. The nuclear energy showed decline from 22% to 17% over the given period of 18 years.
Overall, the greatest energy was produces from oil and the least from hydrogen and other renewable energy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-25 | Mikul Patel | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-25 | Mikul Patel | 56 | view |
| 2018-11-04 | phuong cao | 78 | view |
| 2018-04-11 | Thira | 84 | view |
| 2018-02-15 | Thira | 61 | view |
- Some students take one year off between finishing school and going to university, in order to travel or to work. Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages? 56
- The graph below shows the sales of children's books, adult fiction and educational books between 2002 and 2006 in one country. 73
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003. 67
- The given graph shows the nitrogen oxide emissions produced by four vehicles 74
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause severe social problems as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 532.0 965.302439024 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 126.0 196.424390244 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.22222222222 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.35036895883 3.73543355544 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.99766807868 2.65546596893 75% => OK
Unique words: 72.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 149.4 283.868780488 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.1098796438 43.030603864 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.5 112.824112599 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 15.75 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.875 5.23603664747 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279131215509 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122923834162 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371874311475 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192764755516 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180371369625 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.3 13.2329268293 48% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 90.09 61.2550243902 147% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.9 11.4140731707 60% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.