It is proposed that increasing the fuel’s price is the optimal way to mitigate the Earth’s problems. From my perspective, although this policy is beneficial to some extent, it is not the best approach.
Granted, it is understandable why some might subscribe to the viewpoint that raising the price of fuel has a range of positive impacts. The first rationale for this is that it can reduce the consumption of fuel, given that people are reluctant to pay extra for using them. For example, when fuel is at a higher price, people are discouraged from overusing them unnecessarily but are encouraged to consume wisely for other choices. As a result, environmental problems and the polluted air from vehicles can be gradually decreased. Another notable argument for this is that higher prices on fuel can generate additional revenue that can be allocated towards the environment. In fact, this revenue can contribute to broader efforts in protecting the environment. Consequently, the environment will be more well-protected thanks to this revenue.
Notwithstanding the aforementioned arguments, there are more compelling reasons to believe that it is far from being the best way. First and foremost, raising the cost of fuel has its limited effectiveness. In fact, price increases alone may not be sufficient to significantly deal with environmental problems. For this reason, while higher prices of fuel might deter some individuals from purchasing fuel, others may still be willing to pay the increased costs due to the need of transportation and lack of alternative options. More importantly, it is better to adopt a holistic approach to tackle these worldwide environmental problems, this includes collaborators between governments, educators and communities to address the factors. For example, regarding education, it is essential to have an education program about the environment which aims at enhancing awareness and long-term behaviors. In terms of government, bringing out environmental campaigns plays a vital role to make people get exposed to useful information. Therefore, environmental problems can be easily addressed and solved.
In conclusion, I would restate my position that while there are certain advantages of making the price of fuel higher, I do not think it is the most efficient way.
- Nowadays the use of social media such as facebook twitter and so on is becoming more popular than one on one conversation Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your ans 84
- Some people think it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools Others however believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed schools Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people believe that raising the cost of fuel is one of the best ways to solve the environmental problems Do you agree or disagree with this view 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, regarding, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1963.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43767313019 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23526258285 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565096952909 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3669218364 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.055555556 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0555555556 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255514566964 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823073544181 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322427422449 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153094833011 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425102489444 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.