Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
It is true that many people think that for children, Instead of allowing them watching TV or playing computer games, reading stories from a book is a better way to develop them. I completely agree with this view for both positive and negative.
There are two main reasons why it is necessary to read stories for youngsters. Firstly, Reading stories from a book assistance their imagination and develop a part of thought sooner. Through words, the story happen obviously in their mind and help them understand easily content. Furthermore, Reading stories promote literary appreciation skills, that get children flexible in using language. Secondly, Before going to bed, the kid is told stories by the parents, this like a bridge to close-knit each other. For example, when I was a kid, I was usually listened to by my mother, since then, I felt it confidence in mother.
Apart from the practical benefits expressed above, I believe that watching TV or playing computer games is not bad for children. Because, once the reason is that only reading the book is not only very boring but also dull, watching Tv or playing computer games give an advance for youngsters both images and sound. Besides, stimulating ability to concentrate. However, they just spend a little time on that. As seating in front of the TV's screen for a long time will be harmful for healthy, such as eyes, mental,...
In conclusion, It seems to me that as long as the parents get children balance, whether reading stories from a book or watching TV, playing games is still important to grow up.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | dieulinhxinhgai | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | bepmy2992004 | 67 | view |
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory that of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Topic Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationship people make Has this become a positive or negative development 67
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 84
- Topic some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- In the model world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...armful for healthy, such as eyes, mental,... In conclusion, It seems to me that a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, still, then, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1300.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86891385768 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61134382143 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614232209738 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4770054167 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8571428571 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419292245491 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125033558477 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116685494012 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262851105808 0.151304729494 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670897786833 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.