Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Reading a book is believed to be a better choice for juvenile when compared to using TV and playing video games. In my perspective, I completely disagree with this view for several reasons.
The first argument given to support my opinion is that books usually show the subjective view of the writer. Due to this, youngsters are limited in their own thought and this exerts detrimental impacts on the reaction towards what happened in real life. For example, the author tried to romanticize the world in an exaggerated way so the one who read that book would have some confusion because of how different their lives are. Although knowledge gained from books is worthy, the resources are numerous or in other words, everyone can write a book. As a result, those unknown writers with flashy book's covers often have an advantage over classic ones when being chosen by children, which contains low-quality of details.
Another rationale behind my belief is that TV channels and games on a computer can stimulate the development of kids' behaviour and also increase their awareness to life. When it comes to TV channels, there is a diversity in the type so children can interact with various news and culture. Therefore, despite some adverse programs like advertisement or adult program, kids gain more knowledge from the real-life which is captured via a camera and filtered by producers. Video games show many good signs because of communication with peers and a concentration on virtual missions can be beneficial for kids. These activities can boost their confidence, enhance memory, multitasking skills which make a great contribution to kids.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that TV and video games can bring more benefits to children because books often deny objective view and TV and computer games can show various advantages to a kid's life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | dieulinhxinhgai | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | bepmy2992004 | 67 | view |
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue 75
- The bar chart below shows the estimated sales of jeans for two companies next year in Turkey The pie chart shows the projected market share of the two companies in jeans at the end of next year Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the 71
- Detailed description of crimes on newspaper and TV can have bad consequences on society so this kind of information should be banned in the media To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an exaggerated way" with adverb for "exaggerated"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e author tried to romanticize the world in an exaggerated way so the one who read that book would hav...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kids'' or 'kid's'?
Suggestion: kids'; kid's
... games can show various advantages to a kids life.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09180327869 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73373423646 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609836065574 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.662873408 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.461538462 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232723033036 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791213962836 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633062679441 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159366299561 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508287665129 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.