Some people believe that space travel is a waste of government money while others believe it is important for human development. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your own knowledge or experience. Write AT LEAST 250 words.
Some individuals think that space travel can contribute to human progress, whereas others including me are of the opinion that it might waste government funding. In this essay, I will discuss both views and explain the reasons for my opinion.
There are two reasons that people regard space travel as a crucial factor for human development. The first reason is that space exploration allows individuals to widen their knowledge about the solar system. When traveling outside the Earth, people can be able to see other planets such as Jupiter or Mars within a close distance and even discover new areas in the solar system. Therefore, this can facilitate new explorations of undiscovered planets that are suitable for humans to reside in case the Earth becomes unlivable. Another reason for the support for space travel is that it can help enhance technology and research methods in the field of astronomy, thereby providing opportunities for people to devise revolutionary inventions. For example, the phone camera was invented by a Nasa Jet Propulsion Laboratory scientist named Eugene Lally in 1965 for space travel and it is now one of the most convenient features on cell phones.
However, others including me believe that space travel is a waste of government money due to two reasons. Firstly, it might put astronauts’ lives in danger when there is not enough specialized equipment that can ensure space explorers’ safety. Since the atmosphere outside the Earth lacks gravity, it can be dangerous for astronauts’ breathing systems if they have no careful protection. Secondly, space travel cannot be as urgent as other issues such as climate change, which is currently affecting people’s lives. Climate change is wreaking havoc on humans’ atmosphere, health and natural resources. This means that individuals might lose their current living habitats if measures are not taken. Therefore, the government should fund to solve this urgency instead of spending on space explorations.
In conclusion, while some people contend that space travel is a vital contribution to human development because it can provide beneficial knowledge for new discoveries of unknown planets and facilitates helpful inventions, I believe that it is not worth investing. Since it cannot ensure astronauts’ safety and is not as negatively impactful as current damaging factors to humans, investment for this traveling approach is wasteful to some extent.
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The widespread use of Internet has brought many problems What do you think are the main problems associated with the use of Internet What solutions can you suggest 67
- In many countries children participate in some paid work in their spare time Some people think that this is wrong but others believe that such work will extend children s knowledge and increase their sense of responsibility What is your opinion 73
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2074.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40104166667 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87452819196 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3195217425 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5882352941 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290263297154 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100226908082 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073220329727 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203100177408 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457651126579 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2074.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40104166667 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87452819196 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3195217425 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5882352941 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290263297154 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100226908082 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073220329727 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203100177408 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457651126579 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.