The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.
The table depicts the data on attendance in four different types of secondary schools from 2000 to 2009.
Overall, in 9 years, the total attendance in voluntary-controlled schools was the highest. Moreover, there were distinct trends in the proportion of pupils attending secondary schools. While specialist, grammar and voluntary-controlled schools' attendance went downward, the data for community schools' attendance experienced a massive increase throughout the 9-year period.
In 2000, the percentage of voluntary-controlled school pupils ranked first place (52%), 50% more than that of specialist and community schools (12%). Furthermore, the proportion of grammar schools' attendance ranked second, with 24%, doubling the ratio of specialist and community schools.
During 2005 and 2009, the estimation of community school pupils skyrocketed to the top, with 58% (2009), nearly five times higher than its data in 2000 and a half more than the lowest percentage in 2009. In 2005, voluntary-controlled schools' attendance remained stable at first place despite decreasing, but could not continue to reach the top in the next 4 years as its percentage was only 20%. The other school types, such as specialist and grammar, saw a decrease in the attendance percentage. While the percentage of specialist schools declined gradually and ranked the lowest of the table with only 10% in 2009, attendance at grammar schools decreased by half, from 24% (2000) to 12% (2009).
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane 84
- Some people believe that certain old buildings should be preserved more than others What types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think the advantages of preserving old buildings outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The table below showss the average incomes of scientists employed by an organization 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51785714286 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34609456711 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508928571429 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5848597566 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.6 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329476057449 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162904815188 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100584000828 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255964053291 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1021536715 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51785714286 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34609456711 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508928571429 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5848597566 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.6 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329476057449 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162904815188 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100584000828 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255964053291 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1021536715 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.