Some people believe that tax on junk food should be risen. What is the purpose of this notion? What is the negative impact of this notion?
A notion to implement higher junk food tax is justifiable when the government will gain more revenue from this regulation. However, such tax burdened to consumer give negative impact for small companies, making them will be collapsed.
It is justifiable to burden a higher tax on junk food due to increasing government revenue. When people consume such food, they will be forced to add their budget to pay higher junk food tax which makes government get more money from those transactions. For instance, In 2020, Indonesian government rise the tax rate from 10% to 15% on consuming fast food, escalating the revenues 5% from junk food consumption in restaurants, equivalent with 100 millions rupiah . Therefore, more revenues collected thorough such regulation can be used to finance the country's development like constructing public infrastructure in remote areas in Indonesia
In contrast, charging higher tax on junk food consumption tend to make Micro, Small, Medium Enterprises collapse. Since the government implements such tax, the consumer shifts their preference from MSME to larger restaurants which tend to be unaffected with such tax, making MSME's revenue drops dramatically. In example, when Malaysian government burdened such progressive consumption tax, the income collected by the MSME felt down from 1 million ringgit to 300 thousand ringgit, causing them unpaid their staff salaries and other operational expenses during 2019 period. This condition makes small business owners are forced to close their restaurants and many people who work in such business will lose their jobs.
In conclusion, although the government may collect more money from the regulation, small companies will have a financial distress. Therefore, the viable solution to decrease negative effect from such conditions is giving different tax rates between small companies and corporations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nts, equivalent with 100 millions rupiah . Therefore, more revenues collected thor...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58885017422 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90107439389 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578397212544 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8261307484 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.818181818 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180042710457 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855182306214 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577907408947 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129436923524 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762977636296 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.