the two maps below show and island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities
The changes of developing some tourist accommodations happened in an island are depicted in the maps.
Overall, many tourist facilities which are connected with footpath and vehicle track are built in those areas. Although some infrastructures are developed, the development of the island remain trees growing in the island.
Initially, the island is uninhabited land where some coconut trees have been grown in some areas. Afterwards, the developer constructs eight homestays in the east which are connected with circle footpath, and six accommodations in the east that are integrated with swimming areas in the beach located to west of the island through such footpath.
In addition, Visitors can reach the island by ship since pier is built to south of island. While some of food and beverage can be found in the north, receptionist office is constructed in the center in which vehicle track is developed to integrate this office with all facilities. However, the figure for coconut trees shows no change even though many facilities developed for tourists.
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries in three different years over a twenty year period
- Some people believe that tax on junk food should be risen What is the purpose of this notion What is the negative impact of this notion 82
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries in three different years over a twenty year period
- the graph below shows the use of solar energy in four different countries 90
- Some people believe arts are important in people s lives Do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...many facilities developed for tourists.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 902.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33727810651 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84933208368 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573964497041 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5771754186 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.75 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227685401121 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106397233358 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388321003576 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153987602665 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224247856313 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.