Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time This can benefit teenagers and the community as well To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time. This can benefit teenagers and the community as well. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people think that adolescents need to do volunteer work in their spare time as such actions are beneficial not only to the teenagers but also to the society. From my perspective, I totally disagree with this statement, and I believe that teenagers should be rewarded for their time and efforts.

To begin with, that people oblige youngsters to participate in non-profit occupations can detrimentally affect their study and scholastic results. Teenagers, especially students nowadays, are already under tremendous pressure since they have excessive homework and exams to complete everyday. For example, if adolescents are forced to take part in community work, they will not have enough time to finish their assignments. Spending too much time on doing unpaid jobs can neglect their studies; therefore, that may result in poor academic performance at school and impact unfavorably on their future.

Additionally, forcing adolescents to do volunteer work can lead to adverse influences on society. Firstly, people may take unfair advantage of the teenagers' contribution. For instance, because youngsters do the jobs without salary, some organisations tend to hire them instead of the experienced workers in order to reduce the expenditure on paying employees. Moreover, when youngsters are not paid for their efforts, they may feel discouraged due to the lack of motivation. Therefore, that the working productivity decreases can result in slow social development and economic growth.

However, young people should be encouraged to take part in volunteer work because they can acquire many social skills such as: communicating, cooperating, sharing,... which can be useful for their life. Furthermore, I believe that rewards should be given in different forms to praise their contribution and inspire them in attending such work.

In conclusion, it is unreasonable to require teenagers to do unpaid community work. And the youngsters should get recognition of their efforts.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-17 fdsugb22 view
2023-06-21 shwetarani 56 view
2023-05-08 tmai41587 view
2023-02-05 katyhot1 view
2022-12-20 jahidhumayun@gmail.com 67 view
Essays by user labaongoc :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 284, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...xcessive homework and exams to complete everyday. For example, if adolescents are forced...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 148, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teenagers'' or 'teenager's'?
Suggestion: teenagers'; teenager's
...people may take unfair advantage of the teenagers contribution. For instance, because you...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 163, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... as: communicating, cooperating, sharing,... which can be useful for their life. F...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60264900662 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05311660208 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579470198675 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5086388279 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.75 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1875 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384817109644 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127300072223 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960579920733 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242419271704 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899720645497 0.056905535591 158% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.