Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time This can benefit teenagers and the community as well To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time. This can benefit teenagers and the community as well. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In today’s era, teenagers should be encouraged to work more for their community free of cost in their leisure time. It will be beneficial not only for these youngsters but also for the community. I completely agree with this approach and below essay will shed some light on the same.
Firstly, teenagers have numerous distractions available in their life such as, a social media, a money, an exposure to newly emerging technologies because of which, they are unable to focus on their primary goals. So, these distractions waste their time and hardly help them to boost their creativity. Hence, unpaid community work can improve their productivity.
Besides, community work will help teenagers not only to develop the sense of achievement but also to gain teamwork experience. Additionally, it gives them satisfaction of utilizing their time to help people. For instance, I had participated in the tree plantation campaign, which was arranged by one of the non-profitable NGO. It inspired me to give my contribution to the society as well as to the environment.
Young generations can easily play their part in these type of community works like teaching in rural areas, cleaning the remote historical places, without thinking about money. The reason behind it is, the community work is mostly considered as a voluntary activity and it helps to develop our own society and keep it running for upcoming generations.
In conclusion, young people should invest their time in unpaid community services. It can create awareness about different problems of society and make them ready for the future.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-17 fdsugb22 view
2023-06-21 shwetarani 56 view
2023-05-08 tmai41587 view
2023-02-05 katyhot1 view
2022-12-20 jahidhumayun@gmail.com 67 view
Essays by user Indrayani Yadav :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In today’s era, teenagers should be enco...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssay will shed some light on the same. Firstly, teenagers have numerous distrac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y work can improve their productivity. Besides, community work will help teenag...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ociety as well as to the environment. Young generations can easily play their ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it running for upcoming generations. In conclusion, young people should inves...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20930232558 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88976818632 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62015503876 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4501825928 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306138961157 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107609861027 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924786537801 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167506208407 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466742818837 0.056905535591 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.