Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is argued that each type of crime should have a specific punishment. While others argue that when deciding on a punishment, the circumstances of a specific crime, as well as the motivation for doing it, should always be considered. In this essay, I will discuss both these views and give my opinion about these issues.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Firstly when each kind of crime punish specifically, there will make a fair for crime. For example, there are two each type of crimes committed different crimes if they punish the same specific punishments, they will feel more fair and accept that punishment. Moreover, if crimes do not punish a specific punishment, they will feel unfair and probably resist with the punishments. Secondly, fixing punishments for each type of crime will make criminal judgement faster and less time-consuming. Overall, for each type of offence, certain punishments will have more benefits.
On the other hand, I believe that crime should be taken into account by the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it when deciding on punishment. To begin with, this will make crimes become more obey and do not commit again. For instance, if there is a criminal who commits a serious crime, the judgement must base on that crime to decide the punishment for them. This will make crimes feel their punishment is worthy of their actions. Hence, punishing rely on the situation and the motivation for committing can make criminals do not commit again and feeling worthy their punishments.
In conclusion, although punishing the specific punishments can make crime feel more fair and make criminal judgement become more faster, it seems to me that punishment is based on the situation and motivation of criminal action of each criminal will be better.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-12-20 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
2023-07-25 | minhanhtran2112 | 73 | view |
2023-04-24 | Aung | 78 | view |
2022-10-12 | namanpluck | 84 | view |
2022-07-29 | ulzzang | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of unemployed people aged between 15 and 24 in five European countries in 2005 compared with the overall percentage of unemployment in those countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main featu 73
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 73
- The table below shows the number of temporary migrant workers in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1 000 people in these countries in 2006 73
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in USA 67
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'faster' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: faster
...fair and make criminal judgement become more faster, it seems to me that punishment is base...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07911392405 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74474013008 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.443037974684 0.561755894193 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8944878046 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1333333333 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.545946873593 0.244688304435 223% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.236195418794 0.084324248473 280% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161025505813 0.0667982634062 241% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343383115153 0.151304729494 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110110088172 0.056905535591 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.