Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
Discuss both of these two views and give your own opinion.
It is said that the government should impose a fixed punishment for every type of crime. While I accept that there are some advantages to each type of crime obtain a fixed fine, I strongly believe that the authority should take the situation of each person into consideration when making sentences.
On the one hand, there are several reasons for why every crime has its own punishment. One of the major factors is that it is time saving for determination in cases having the same result. For example, every murder have to serve life-sentence even they do not intentionally. Additionally, fixed punishment could help to enhance the awareness of citizens about how heavy the fine is when they sentenced. As a result, these punishments act as a deterrent to make people think carefully before breaking the law.
On the other hand, I completely believe that government should have a careful inspection about each person’s context and their motivation when they commit the crime to decide the punishment. The major reason for this is that it assists profoundly in showing the moral aspect in humanity. Although people who commit the crime must learn that unlawful actions have consequences, a decrease in punishment depending on their circumstances will give them a chance to fix their mistake and change their attitude. Considering the offender’s circumstances and motivation is advantageous in a way that it still contains the hopefulness for people who are accidentally guilty to embark their new life after being punished. For instance, in case of being sexual abuse, the offenders have to protect themselves from attack by hitting the opponent which lead them break the law.
In conclusion, despite the fact that a fixed fine have some positive effects, I also argued that the authority should consider the situation and motivation of each person when judging and making decisions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Turonxoja | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | olParya | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | tkngan213 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | khanhptk162 | 61 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 61
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argued that it is better to try and improve such situations. 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 67
- The charts below show the average percentage in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. 61
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rson when judging and making decisions.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20454545455 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92896014928 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551948051948 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9041781999 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.307692308 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40227765884 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132788640182 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821093918491 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240603310257 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0870313571455 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.