Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Although, some people argue that criminals depends on their offense type should be punished fixedly, others, however, contend there are other measures that should be considering in decision such as situation of the crime and the aim for doing it. I agree with the second view
On the one hand, a good reason that why prosecutors should assume the situation and aim of a crime and I agree is in some situations many innocent people have to act a crime because of outer threats. For example, an employer threatens a person who is an employee to manipulate some financial due to survive his or her family. Therefore, in this occasion the aim of acting a crime is not individual motivations, it stems from exotic menace, however, some criminals fraud due to personal advantages. it is entirely unfair to consider the same verdicts while the aims vary particularly.
On the other hand, there are some people claim the wardens should denounce fixedly without considering any positions. They contend in terms of eradicating many huge offences, it is an appropriate idea that verdicts be fixed through the crime name. In other word, it is no different between a burglary or robbery both must have the same fine and prison periods to prevent and decrease the crime rate.
In conclusion, while, some people believe it is recklessness to convict offenders without considering its motivations and situations, other argue that the fines of the specific crime should be fixed. I agree with the first view as many crimes are based on accidental decisions or threats.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Turonxoja | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | olParya | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | tkngan213 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | khanhptk162 | 61 | view |
- You have just returned from holiday and were not satisfied with your trip. Write to the travel agency. In your letter Say where / when you went on holiday Explain why you are not satisfied with your holiday Tell them what you would like them to do 81
- You recently stayed in a hotel in a large city. The weather was very unusual for the time of year and the heating / cooling system in the hotel was quite inadequate.Write a letter to the manager of the hotel. In your letter:give details of what went wrong 81
- You are in hospital as a result of a recent accident. Your co-workers have visited you severaltimes and have given you cards and flowers.Write to your workmates. In your letter• Tell them about your current condition• Thank them for their thoughts and 73
- You recently attended a meeting at a hotel. When you returned home, you found you had left some important papers at the hotel. Write a letter to the manager of the hotel. Say where you think you left the papers. Explain why they are so important. Tell the 73
- You and some friends ate a meal at a restaurant to celebrate a special occasion, and you were very pleased with the food and service.Write a letter to the restaurant manager. In your letter:•Give details of your visit to the restaurant•Explain the rea 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r doing it. I agree with the second view On the one hand, a good reason that why ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 455, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'criminals'' or 'criminal's'?
Suggestion: criminals'; criminal's
...stems from exotic menace, however, some criminals fraud due to personal advantages. it is...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 499, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...inals fraud due to personal advantages. it is entirely unfair to consider the same...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1309.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0153256705 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71500211349 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55938697318 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.4257292096 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.9 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372486935648 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136422221478 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11074157396 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242192591131 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774765798367 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.