Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
There are arguments that each kind of criminal should be punished consistently. However, some people are convinced that when the justice makes the punishment statement, they should consider the situations and the motives of a criminal. In my opinion, I would argue that the circumstances and motivation play a critical role to commitment of any criminal, so they should be taken into account for their punishment.
On the one hand, it is sure for say that it finds fair to apply the consistent punishment for criminals who commit the same crime. It enables all citizens to perceive the fairness of the law and no discrimination in the community. In addition to this, this provides all the residents with the full knowledge and information about the punishment for all types of crime, it is the measures to prevent citizens from the crime commitment. Take the capital punishment for heroin trafficking as an example, when citizens have plan to do heroin trafficking, they will be cautious because the punishment for this crime is very heavy.
On the other hand, it can be argued that some individuals commit a crime is due to they face the dilemmas and have hinder reasons beyond their crime. It is explained by plenty of criminal that give rise from being self-defense, and protect themselves from the attacks of other people. For instance, unfortunately, a woman gets raped by a drunk man, then she is self defense and kills this man. In case of this woman, the justice should pay attention to her situation and motivation to make the legitimate statement to her.
In conclusion, there are convincing arguments both for and against the consistency of the punishment, but I believe that the justice will consider about the logic and cause-effect to make up their minds.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 521, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'planned'.
Suggestion: planned
...cking as an example, when citizens have plan to do heroin trafficking, they will be ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, then, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87054009734 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553691275168 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1048270678 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.166666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413477676717 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138619387178 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899071284927 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221793198503 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121500727548 0.056905535591 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.