Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account then deciding on the punishment. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Recently, the idea of whether or not to fix criminal punishments has been gaining in popularity, which becomes heated debate among citizens. Although some believe that particular sort of crime should be received equal level of treatment regardless of the situation where crime is committed, others believe that individual situations and motivation should lead to various decisions.
It is clear that stable punishments benefit the government in terms of time and labor. Firstly, without considering different cases of offenders, law suits for punishments could be programmed and processed by information system. For example, some minor crime such as avoiding taxation receive nearly the same level of punishment through calculation, which facilitates the punishment decision in short time. Secondly, in case that innovative lawsuits are published, same treatments appear as more convenient to educate citizens. In reality, too detailed information acts as a deterrent for citizens to remember and apply.
However, the argument to judge particular circumstances is more likely to convince people thanks to its humane characteristic. It is undeniable that the motivation for crime commitment plays such an essential part in deciding treatments. Therefore, offenders who intentionally commit crime should not be equally treat as the ones who try to protect themselves in danger. Finally, other aspect such as ages of offenders need to be considered as well since juvenile delinquency by minors come along with low capability to control their behaviors. As a result, education appears as a more convincing approach to crime controlling.
In conclusion, although fixed treatments can save time and labor in progressing individual criminal circumstances, its counterpart seem to be a more humane approach to criminal punishment. By taking other aspects such as motivation and age of offenders into account, the humanity of law will be efficiently utilized.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Turonxoja | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | olParya | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | tkngan213 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | khanhptk162 | 61 | view |
- Nowadays many students have the opportunity to study part or all of theirs courses in foreign countries. While studying abroad brings many benefits to individual students, it also has a number of disadvantages. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Every minute every day, people suffer and lives are lost needlessly because of a lack of safe water and sanitation, the population is being viewed as the real problem and controlling birthrates should totally address the problem. To what extent do you agr 84
- Should traffic jams be handled by government or individuals? 78
- Music intellectual property 80
- These days, more and more people are going to other countries for significant periods of time,either to find job or to study. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
Recently, the idea of whether or not to fix criminal punishments has been ga...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 146, Rule ID: LAWSUIT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lawsuits'?
Suggestion: lawsuits
...nsidering different cases of offenders, law suits for punishments could be programmed and...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty of law will be efficiently utilized.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in short, sort of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65306122449 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13464486451 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.281129095 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.714285714 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358787089661 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102922405013 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738991059358 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198380540441 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519240150817 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.