It is hard to deny that using taxes paid by citizens to build some high-tech projects such as satellites and space ships has little influence on our well-being promoting seemingly, and such a fact leads impressionable people to generate the opinion that personal taxes should be exempted by the government as paying taxes is a kind of deprivation of personal wealth and reduces the desire for consumption, which does harm to the social economy. However, such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies, and it should be examined meticulously. As far as equality, economy, and innovation are concerned, I strongly hold that we ought to pay a suitable amount of taxes.
First and foremost, paying personal income taxes can help people with disadvantaged backgrounds and improve their life qualities as well as narrow the gap of wealth between the rich and the poor. To be more specific, the additional revenue can be then provided as subsidies for the poor families so that they can make some improvement materially. Furthermore, the government can levy the income taxes according to the income level, meaning that the rich will be levied more taxes, this might be a good method to narrow the gap of wealth and promote social equality.
Furthermore, the fact that levying income taxes promotes social economy indicates that citizens who are benefited are supposed to pay some part of the money they earn as taxes. Take the case of China, which provides free nine-year compulsory education and medical insurance for Chinese people and income tax plays a significant role in it. As a result, the dropout rate in the countryside has dropped dramatically over the years and more children can finish basic education before they start their work. At the same time, people can see a doctor without paying a large amount of money that they cannot afford. Had it not been for the levying of income taxes, the Chinese would not have such a good education and medicine system and their life qualities would not be improved a lot.
Nevertheless, a voice arises that the government invests a lot of money in national defence and high-tech projects, which are far away from our lives, and some failure projects just result in a waste of money. Ironically, these projects are close with our lives, without which we would not enjoy the 5G phones, the G-series high-speed train, and other techniques that bring us with convenience. And without a solid national defence, we would not live peacefully in such a big country. Though some projects may fail and the investment is gone, it is just a small part compared to the achievements. Therefore, levying income taxes and investing high-tech projects promotes innovation and finally brings benefits to our society.
In a nutshell, I maintain that we should pay income taxes suitably, as this policy promotes equality and production of our society, and benefits the national economy and technical innovation.
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should not pay any tax to the state To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people who have been successful in society don t attribute their success to the theoretical knowledge they learned from their university Do you agree the theoretical knowledge is not as valuable as expected 84
- Some people believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should not pay any tax to the state To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Society is based on rules and laws It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted To what extent do you agree or disagree 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...wealth and promote social equality. Furthermore, the fact that levying income taxes pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 25.0 10.4138276553 240% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2478.0 1615.20841683 153% => OK
No of words: 490.0 315.596192385 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05714285714 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70488508055 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72621286185 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497959183673 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 780.3 506.74238477 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.4521618177 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.764705882 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8235294118 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201410587882 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671467516886 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051699774048 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115575620977 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449963921698 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.